This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ patch/rfc] PR 16859

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: "'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 22:18:10 -0800
Subject: Re: [C++ patch/rfc] PR 16859
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <4227A48B.3020402@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi!

I had a look at this PR, which seems not too difficult for me.

In my tentative patch, I'm enforcing 8.5.1/4 only when -pedantic,
simply looking at *initp. Makes sense? Passes C/C++/libstdc++-v3
testsuites on x86-linux.

Is this patch against tte mainline? I don't see the code you're patching.

I think it would be cleaner to do the check in complete_array_type.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ patch/rfc] PR 16859
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- [C++ Patch] PR 16859 (Take 2)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ patch/rfc] PR 16859
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]