This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PR c++/20280] hoist indirect_ref out of addressable cond_exprs
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:58:42 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PR c++/20280] hoist indirect_ref out of addressable cond_exprs
- References: <oroee1xj5d.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Mar 3, 2005, at 2:50 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
I'm bootstrapping this on x86_64-linux-gnu, along with the patch for
PR c++/20103; it's also passed C++ regression testing. Ok to install
if bootstrap and all-languages regression testing passes?
I think this is the wrong approach, we should be doing the same for all
types (well except for bitfields) and not just "addressable" types, see
PR 19199 for a testcase where we get this wrong and there is a proposed
way of fixing this from RTH.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski