This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Remove O(N^2) complexity from cgraph_remove_node (fwd)

From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:07:37 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove O(N^2) complexity from cgraph_remove_node (fwd)
References: <20050301163910.GA10731@nevyn.them.org><Pine.LNX.4.44.0503011747040.2297-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de><20050301185933.GA3751@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <4224CAE5.1050203@codesourcery.com>

Hi,

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Mark Mitchell wrote:

> Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> > I think this is satisfactory ;) The patch is OK for mainline and I guess
> > it is Mark's call concerning 4.0 branch but I don't see nothing bad in
> > that idea except for fact that I am unsure that 1% speedup on pooma can
> > be declared regression fix.
> 
> URL for the patch, please?

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00032.html


Ciao,
Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove O(N^2) complexity from cgraph_remove_node (fwd)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove O(N^2) complexity from cgraph_remove_node (fwd)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [PATCH] Remove O(N^2) complexity from cgraph_remove_node (fwd)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Remove O(N^2) complexity from cgraph_remove_node (fwd)
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [PATCH] Remove O(N^2) complexity from cgraph_remove_node (fwd)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]