This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [fortran, patch] Patch for PR18827

Ping again! 
It seems that all the maintainers and reviewers do not care about it. If you
don't care, I don't care. I just feel sick about the increasing bugs in the
list. Isn't it a policy that all the patchs should be approval? 

I have no write access. In fact, I am very glad to commit the patchs myself.
Can I apply this "privilege", maintainers?

Feng Wang

 --- Feng Wang <> 的正文:
> ping.
> Feng Wang
>  --- Feng Wang <> 的正文:
> > This patch fix pr18827. Allows variables in a common block to be assigned a
> > label. And do not set symbol's assign attribute when match assigned goto
> > statement and i/o statements using label assigned variable. We should set
> it
> > only when match assign statment. And add checking this attribute when
> > resolving.
> > 
> > But this patch reveals another bug of the backend. The backend will remove
> > the
> > label unless we set !DECL_ARTIFICIAL flag on assigned label, even we set
> > discussion with Steven, we reserve the setting of !DECL_ARTIFICIAL on
> > assigned
> > label to fix pr18827. And after committing this patch, I will file a BE bug
> > reporting.
> > 
> > Tested on i686 with no regression. If it is ok, please commit it.
> > 

Do You Yahoo!?

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]