This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Improve inlining heuristics for 4.0


On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:57:05 +0100 (CET), Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:

> where we get negative size for x after inlining.  I'll need to find
> a way to detect if we are in fact ignoring the return value of a
> function.  Is there an easy way to do so?

If the CALL_EXPR is at statement level and CALL_EXPR_HAS_RETURN_SLOT_ADDR
is not true, we are ignoring the return value.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]