Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678

[FranÃois-Xavier Coudert <Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at lcp dot u-psud dot fr>]

> Doesn't this patch mean that DOS line breaks ('\n\r') will be interpreted as
> two separators?

No, since DOS line breaks are "\r\n". All matching that was done with '\n' 
is now done with '\n' or '\r', while all "eating" still only looks for '\n'. 
In current form, it works only because DOS line breaks are "\r\n" and not 
"\n\r".

> > 	PR libfortran/19678
> > 	* list_read.c: Add support for DOS files
>
> This level of detail is insufficient.  See
> <http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html> and
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html> for a detailed description of what
> a ChangeLog should look like.  Basically, you must list all changed functions,
> and the changes therein.

What about:

2005-02-24  FranÃois-Xavier Coudert  <coudert@clipper.ens.fr>

	PR libfortran/19678
	* list_read.c: Add support for DOS files, adding '\r' in the list of 
possible separators (is_separator and CASE_SEPARATORS). Many tests for "c == 
'\n'" changed to "(c == '\n' || c == '\r')" (in next_char, eat_separator, 
finish_separator, read_real and namelist_read).


FX