This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] PR 19552
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 10:46 -0800, Devang Patel wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > It seems to me you'd be better off calling bsi_after_labels in
> > process_phi_nodes rather than bsi_start as shown in the attached
> > patch.
> > That seems cleaner -- why correct a bogus insertion point when
> > we can just get the right one from the start?
> I agree.
Cool. Consider that patch pre-approved once it bootstraps and