This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Split simplify_unary_operation and simplify_binary_operation
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:37:47 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Split simplify_unary_operation and simplify_binary_operation
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Roger Sayle wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The function simplify_const_relational_operation
ends up being useful in its own right, and can potentially be used
by other RTL optimizers when its known both operands are constant.
Here is a patch, bootstrapped powerpc-apple-darwin7.7.0, regtested with
no regressions. Ok for mainline?
I was wondering whether you (or other maintainers) could comment on
the policies for mainline patches that perform large text rearrangements
but with no functional changes, such as Paolo's patch to split the
large functions simplify_binary_operation and simplify_unary_operation
and potentially Kazu's patches for splitting fold.
I think those kinds of changes should wait for Stage 1.