This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PR c++/17788] add decl for implicit default ctor even ifill-formed


On 15 Feb 2005 12:14:24 -0200, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Feb 14, 2005, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Feb 2005 15:20:05 -0200, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> +// In ISO C++ 1998, it is not illegal to define such a class, but if
>>> +// the implicitly-declared constructor is used, then it is
>>> +// implicitly defined and found to be ill-formed.
>
>> Please clarify that this comment refers to the derived class, not to
>> struct0.
>
> 'k
>
>> Why is your change to the DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION code necessary?
>
> Because otherwise we get all such error messages pointing to the
> location of the final input token, when we expand delayed functions
> and lazily-defined ctors/dtors/etc.

Then the patch is OK.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]