This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tcb] Value Range Propagation
Andrew Haley wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if it needs a little tweaking. I will be
evaluating this and elimination of redundant mudflap instrumentation in
the next few days.
Diego Novillo writes:
> This pass is essentially the same as constant propagation, except
> that instead of propagating single values, we propagate value
Thanks, Diego! I really wanted this in order to get bounds check
elimination working for Java. I'll see if it does that.