This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev?

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> >> and the code produced is even better than before with -fno-tree-pre!
> >>
> >> For a runtime test of the tramp3d testcase we gain about 2% in
> >> runtime compared to -fno-tree-pre and about 5% compared to -ftree-pre
> >> without your patch.
> >
> > Btw., we take a compile-time hit of ~0.5% for the tramp3d testcase,
> > but this could well be noise.
> Can you give this patch a try and let me know if it still has the same
> effect?
> It's like the last patch, only it will remove dead code that is not
> inserted.
> (It's currently in stage2 of bootstrap, but my last version of itpassed
> all regressions test, and all i did was update the comments and remove the
> processed sbitmap :P)

It basically does the same, the only difference is

alwazn:tests> diff pr19624.cpp.t50.pre.after pr19624.cpp.t50.pre
> Removing unnecessary insertion:pretmp.102_1654 = i_719 + 1;
<   pretmp.102D.5437_1654 = iD.2790_719 + 1;

though that may be because there are a few day of updates between
the runs.


Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]