This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] FOR_EACH_RTX construct to replace for_each_rtx

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:52:40 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FOR_EACH_RTX construct to replace for_each_rtx
References: <41EE99B0.9090806@lu.unisi.ch> <20050119190053.GD8144@redhat.com> <41EF673F.7000200@lu.unisi.ch> <200501200951.01408.stevenb@suse.de>

4% is very tempting ;-)
Probably the iterator itself could be speeded up a bit also, because
alloca can be quite expensive.  Have you tried the freelist idea already?
Maybe an alloc pool?

No, not yet. But I think a VEC will be enough.

Paolo

References:
- [PATCH] FOR_EACH_RTX construct to replace for_each_rtx
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] FOR_EACH_RTX construct to replace for_each_rtx
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] FOR_EACH_RTX construct to replace for_each_rtx
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] FOR_EACH_RTX construct to replace for_each_rtx
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]