This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: Do not install specs file
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, echristo at redhat dot com
- Date: 17 Jan 2005 18:17:21 -0200
- Subject: Re: RFC: Do not install specs file
- Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team
- References: <200412200229.iBK2TwXF020264@sirius.codesourcery.com><orsm60j20y.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><41C729BE.7090304@codesourcery.com><ory8fs8eaz.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><87651xt8i8.fsf@redhat.com><oracr8kl0l.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><87acr87xcs.fsf@redhat.com>
On Jan 17, 2005, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com> wrote:
> it's needed because the other specs expect there to be some sort of
> -mabi switch.
Aah, yes.
>>> +# Install a link that 32-bit toolchains can use.
>>> +SHLIB_INSTALL += ; \
>>> + case $(SHLIB_SOLINK) in \
>>> + *_32.so) \
>> [...]
>>
>> Neat!
> You said further up in your reply that you don't think it's
> essential to have the same link-time names, so do you think it's
> worth keeping?
I wouldn't mind if it went away.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}