This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Remove dead #ifdef from toplev.c
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:28:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: Remove dead #ifdef from toplev.c
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc
- References: <41DEFC98.9080700@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 22:18 +0100, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> While investigating the use of setvbuf to speed up Fortran error printing, I
> noticed this use of IO_BUFFER_SIZE. Since this is the only mention of I_B_S
> in the gcc sources, this code is dead, and has been so ever since Zack removed
> IO_BUFFER_SIZE with <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg01213.html>.
>
> I verified that the compiler still builds, and ran the Fortran testsuite with
> it with no regressions. I didn't commit this as obvious, because I wanted to
> verify that I don't have to build all frontends and run the entire testsuite. Ok?
>
> - Tobi
>
> 2005-01-07 Tobias Schl"uter <tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
>
> * toplev.c (init_asm_output): Remove dead #ifdef.
Well, you really should do the full build/test cycle. Consider the
patch approved once you go through that cycle.
Jeff