This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ lexical analysis rework
- From: Matt Austern <matt at lafstern dot org>
- To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
- Cc: Steve Naroff <snaroff at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:15:04 -0800
- Subject: Re: C++ lexical analysis rework
- References: <BE108272.8A89email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Jan 16, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Although other targets may still depend on stabs for quite a while?
I'm only a SPARC maintainer and most SPARC targets have switched to
far as I know (the only big name left is OpenBSD). If the biggest
STABS (Apple) and the C++ maintainers are fine with the change, so am
Apple hasn't seen a problem with this yet. I'm still trying to figure
out why. Possibly, as Zack suggested, -gused takes care of most of the
cases where it might hurt.