This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Fix PR19401: always completely peel loops


Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

| On Jan 13, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > I disagree.  Optimizations should support language usages/patterns and
| > language idioms.  Not all languages have the same idioms or usage
| > patterns.  There are optimizations that can benefits to set of
| > languages; but not all of them fall into that observation.
| > We've been through this many times.
| 
| Yes they might use different idioms but most of the time the
| optimizations don't do anything for the languages which use
| that feature so it should not matter to them.  Anything which turns

You left out your statement I was objecting to:

                                                 No optimization
   should be dependent on what front-end you used.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]