This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] explicitly update the branch

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:10:59AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <> writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:24:19PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> >> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, David O'Brien wrote:
> >> > Permission to commit?
> >> > This change makes sure that one keeps the branch that was checked out
> >> > when doing an update.
> >> > 
> >> >	* contrib/gcc_update: Explicitly update the branch.
> >> 
> >> I assume you _only_ want to have that on the 3.4 branch?
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >> If that's the case, I guess the patch is okay, but please wait a couple
> >> of days and update the list of copyright years before committing.
> >
> > Will do.  Thanks.
> It's useless unless you have a quite different CVS than me.
> Look up "sticky tags" in the CVS manual.

One might have a .cvsrc file that would undo the sticky tag.
There are other actions one could do that could potentiall mess things
up that I guess you haven't considered.  If one has checked out a
contrib/ on a branch and then does a gcc_update I think it is clear they
want that branch.
-- David  (

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]