This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [testcase] Test attribute((used)) vs. i386 local calling convention

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:27:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [testcase] Test __attribute__((used)) vs. i386 local calling convention
References: <20050113113733.GU10340@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20050113173751.GB14076@redhat.com> <20050113173958.GZ10340@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:39:58PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Why?  asm ("movl $foo, %k0" : "=r" (fn));  works for lp64 as well.

Oh, right, for small-model code.  Nevermind.


r~

References:
- [testcase] Test __attribute__((used)) vs. i386 local calling convention
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [testcase] Test __attribute__((used)) vs. i386 local calling convention
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [testcase] Test __attribute__((used)) vs. i386 local calling convention
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [testcase] Test __attribute__((used)) vs. i386 local calling convention

Re: [testcase] Test attribute((used)) vs. i386 local calling convention