This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR19100: truthvalue_conversion vs. TREE_OVERFLOW (take 3)


    > 	* fold-const.c (fold_convert_const): Don't set TREE_OVERFLOW when
    > 	converting constants from one integer type to another.

    Is this OK with the Ada/Java folks?  It certainly makes sense to me from 
    a C/C++ perspective.

It wouldn't be OK with me if it never got set, but my understanding is
that it still will, but this change just affects *where* it's set.  Please
correct me if I'm wrong, Roger.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]