This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [sa]: Revert partial def stuff, use fake variables instead


Hello,

> >this is basically what I do now.  The problematic case is if you turn a[i]
> >into *newiv_1.  Then we have to get tags for the newiv_1 pointer, which
> >is problematic (see the discussion following
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg01897.html for details).
> 
> If you have turned a non-pointer access into a pointer access, then you 
> *have* to either rerun alias analysis, or create name/type tags with the 
> approriate aliases (if you know them).

which seems terribly wrong to me.  Why should I need to change anything
so complicated, when I did not make any change that should affect
results of alias analysis?  It just speaks of a wrong design to me
(and since you are now making significant changes to the system, would
not it be a nice opportunity to change it? :-)

Zdenek


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]