This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bit manipulation functions

From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:58:24 +0100
Subject: Re: bit manipulation functions
References: <20041205180036.GA30046@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200412051951.30930.paul@codesourcery.com> <20041205214543.GA31112@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200412122108.41315.paul@codesourcery.com> <20041212222333.GA28153@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve Kargl wrote:
> Thanks.  Note, f90-intrinsic-bit.f in the g77 testsuite now almost
> compiles.  I haven't looked at this failure, yet.  But, someone 
> familiar with the gfortran testsuite may want to integrate 
> f90-intrinsic-bit.f into it.

I have a patch which fixes the compiler error and the linker error, which is
of course hidden by the compielr error.  Unfortunately, the execution test
fails with my patch.  I'll look into this on Tuesday.

- Tobi

References:
- Re: bit manipulation functions
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: bit manipulation functions
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: bit manipulation functions
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]