This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH]: Fix places where we expect non-null loops in the looparray
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Diego Novillo wrote:
Daniel Berlin wrote:
This is normal for both the RTL and tree level, apparently (IE this is
what has always happened when we remove loops)."Normal" doesn't mean "right" ;) I'm missing something here. Why not reduce
num_levels as the loops disappear?
Because the loop sibling list isn't linked in such a way that you know
when you've removed the last loop of a given depth.