This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Fix places where we expect non-null loops in the looparray


Daniel Berlin wrote:



On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Diego Novillo wrote:

Daniel Berlin wrote:

Personally, i think it's incredibly weird for the loop info to claim we
have two loops, and num_levels == 2, when one of the loop infos is NULL,
but hey, whatever. :)


So do I. Something seems to be out of synch. Zdenek?


This is normal for both the RTL and tree level, apparently (IE this is what has always happened when we remove loops).

It sounds like something that could be easily remedied tho... if you remove a loop, compress the remaining ones and decrement the number of levels. Or am I missing something about why we wouldnt want to do that.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]