This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Fix places where we expect non-null loops in the looparray

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:59:41 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix places where we expect non-null loops in the looparray
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <1102348700.22437.2.camel@DYN253786YKT>

Daniel Berlin wrote:

Personally, i think it's incredibly weird for the loop info to claim we
have two loops, and num_levels == 2, when one of the loop infos is NULL,
but hey, whatever. :)

So do I. Something seems to be out of synch. Zdenek?


Bootstrapped and regtested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Okay for mainline?

Well, it looks like papering over some consistency problem in the loop data structure. I'd rather see num_levels reflect reality. Unless there's a good reason why this is not important/interesting?

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: Fix places where we expect non-null loops in the looparray
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- [PATCH]: Fix places where we expect non-null loops in the looparray
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]