This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Replace first_rtl_op with TREE_CODE_LENGTH - Part 1/2


Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu> writes:
>> Note the #if 0.  Why is it there, and can we rip out the block
>> entirely?
>
> Probably.  Is every TARGET_EXPR lowered and replaced with something
> else by the time we get to expand_calls_inline?  Looking at
> gimplify.c, I feel that some TARGET_EXPR are lowered.  Other are not.

Given the volume and complexity of code in tree-inline.c messing with
TARGET_EXPRs, I think we should leave well enough alone in HEAD.
If you feel like it, maybe you could do something about this on tcb.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]