This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3, v7-branch] Implement resolution of DR 434

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 23:34:30 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3, v7-branch] Implement resolution of DR 434
References: <419B30D8.9000608@suse.de> <20041117105930.0e88b4ab.bkoz@redhat.com> <20041117190047.GA1450@disaster.jaj.com>

Phil Edwards wrote:

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:59:30AM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

seems rather straightforward. Tested x86-linux, committing to libstdcxx_so_7-branch.

Seems completely straightforward. So much in fact that I'm wondering why you don't put this on mainline. To me, it seems safe even for 3.4. branch....

It looks safe enough for stage 3 mainline to me, too. Like the DR says, other implementations already do this, and I can't imagine existing code that could break.

Ok guys! Tomorrow I will move the patch to mainline too!

Thanks again!
Paolo.

References:
- [v3, v7-branch] Implement resolution of DR 434
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3, v7-branch] Implement resolution of DR 434
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3, v7-branch] Implement resolution of DR 434
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]