This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:20:26PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:I like it. And I really appreciate that you made the changes to the existing tests yourself!
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Janis Johnson wrote:I agree.
{ dg-skip-if message { targets } { include } { exclude } }It also has the advantage of being such that the same dg-skip-if specification would naturally be used both for the x86-only tests which have plain dg-forbid-option and for the tests with special options on x86 that condition dg-forbid-option on being a x86 target. It looks good to me as a dg-forbid-option replacement.
The following would skip a test on an i?86 target when -m64 is one of the command-line options. The dg-do target list could specify all targets on which to run the test.
{ dg-skip-if "" { i?86 } { "*" } { "-m64" } }
This has the advantage of looking like dg-xfail-if.
Mark and Joseph, how's this? Tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
with -m32 and -m64 just to make sure nothing weird happened, and with
contrived tests using dg-skip-if. Eventually I hope to document all
of the dg- directives used in GCC tests.
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC (916) 791-8304 mark@codesourcery.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |