This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] [PR18354] Unary plus as template argument

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: "Jason Merrill" <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Roger Sayle" <roger at eyesopen dot com>,<gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:14:46 +0100
Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] [PR18354] Unary plus as template argument
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411140808200.30708-100000@www.eyesopen.com><03dc01c4cab7$cc62a7e0$2fb82997@bagio> <xypsm7a27fr.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com>

Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:

> I think it's ok to keep it in the C and C++ front ends, so long as
> it's removed by gimplification.  Usually we want to strip redundant
> NOP/CONVERT_EXPRs, and having a separate tree code allows us to
> handle this case differently.

OK then, what about this patch? Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

Giovanni Bajo


cp/
        PR c++/18354
        * typeck.c (build_unary_op) <CONVERT_EXPR, NEGATE_EXPR>: Unify code.
        Make sure the result is always a rvalue.

testsuite/
        PR c++/18354
        * g++.dg/template/nontype11.C: New test.

Attachment: patch-pr18354.txt
Description: Text document

References:
- Re: [C++ PATCH] [PR18354] Unary plus as template argument
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [C++ PATCH] [PR18354] Unary plus as template argument
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: [C++ PATCH] [PR18354] Unary plus as template argument
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]