This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Gomp] Adding libgomp

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Biagio Lucini <lucini at phys dot ethz dot ch>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:54:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [Gomp] Adding libgomp
References: <200411051618.15664.lucini@phys.ethz.ch><1100112729.14048.203.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Diego Novillo wrote:

> I've committed the attached patch to the branch.  There should be no
> functional changes wrt Biagio's original patch:

Why is there a file called ".in" in the patch?

All significant contributors should be noted in gcc/doc/contrib.texi on 
the branch (though you may also put them in AUTHORS).

There's no point in having a one-empty-line INSTALL file.  
gcc/doc/install.texi should contain all the installation instructions for 
the whole of GCC.  There's also no point in the other one-empty-line files 
NEWS and README; check in files when there's contents, but prefer proper 
manuals over miscellaneous text files, and the online release notes over 
plain text NEWS files.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Gomp] Adding libgomp
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [Gomp] Adding libgomp
  - From: Biagio Lucini
- Re: [Gomp] Adding libgomp
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]