This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/pragma-align.c
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:33:58PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > Because of the "sixteen" tag?
> > Yes, in fact I used #pragma pack(16) :-)
> Sorry, but could you clarify a little? According to cvs log, you only changed
> the dg line so the testcase was (before my patch) the same as the original
> version commited 4 years ago. Which was meant to run only on i?86, hence
> probably the 4-byte alignment.
What I meant to say is: in my last previous version of the patch, which
was not posted but I still have in my archives, I added #pragma
pack(16). I don't know why I didn't post that bit; I meant to.
> but then how do you interpret:
> which are 5- and 6-byte large respectively on x86?
*shrug* author of the testcase got bored?