This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [BC] Patch: RFC: indirect dispatch on our own fields
Bryce> Perhaps we should consider just removing the condition and
Bryce> always access static fields via the atable?
Andrew> Sounds good.
Motion carried then. I'm committing the appended instead.
Tom
Index: ChangeLog
from Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* class.c (build_static_field_ref): Don't emit direct references
when using indirect dispatch.
Index: class.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/java/class.c,v
retrieving revision 1.180.2.14
diff -u -r1.180.2.14 class.c
--- class.c 12 Oct 2004 12:42:41 -0000 1.180.2.14
+++ class.c 4 Nov 2004 23:09:04 -0000
@@ -1054,8 +1054,7 @@
However, currently sometimes gcj is too eager and will end up
returning the field itself, leading to an incorrect external
reference being generated. */
- if ((is_compiled
- && (! flag_indirect_dispatch || current_class == fclass))
+ if ((is_compiled && ! flag_indirect_dispatch)
|| (FIELD_FINAL (fdecl) && DECL_INITIAL (fdecl) != NULL_TREE
&& (JSTRING_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (fdecl))
|| JNUMERIC_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (fdecl)))