This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap failure on ppc-darwin

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:36:11 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap failure on ppc-darwin
Organization: GNU
References: <28AE3EDD-2A9F-11D9-9310-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> <m2is8qxhdr.fsf@greed.local> <1099393497.11478.109.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <4187820E.3050500@codesourcery.com> <41878573.2060000@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 13:02, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > 
> 
> >> This patch begs the question why we are passing iterators by value at
> >> all.  Looking at the code generated for all of these little structures
> >> we see huge numbers of structure copies that aren't being eliminated
> >> even when the iterator functions get inlined.
> > 
> > 
> > I have a patch pending which makes the iterators smaller and exclusively
> > passes the address around.
> 
> sorry, I mean bitmap_iterators only, you're talking about all iterators n'est pas?


Yep.

R.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap failure on ppc-darwin
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap failure on ppc-darwin
  - From: Geoffrey Keating
- Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap failure on ppc-darwin
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap failure on ppc-darwin
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap failure on ppc-darwin
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]