This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++] PATCH c++/17542
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
| On 29 Oct 2004 10:41:19 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu> wrote:
|
| > "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it> writes:
| >
| > | Matt Austern wrote:
| > |
| > | > + if (declspecs->attributes)
| > | > + {
| > | > + cp_warning_at ("attribute ignored in declaration of %q#T", t);
| > | > + cp_warning_at ("attribute for %q#T must follow the class key",
| > | > t);
| > | > + }
| > |
| > | I would think that 'class key' is a legal term which is not common in C++
| > | development. Probably saying "enum/class/struct keyword" is a little easier to
| > | follow.
| >
| > I disagree. If we really want to be anal precise about it, we should
| > be displaying the real class-key written by user.
|
| Yes, is that hard to do?
I have had offline conversation with Matt, and it turns out that we
already have code around to do that. I believe Matt is planing to
update his patch.
-- Gaby