This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] std::tr1::tuple

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Chris Jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:34:38 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] std::tr1::tuple
References: <20041025141431.524f9563.bkoz@redhat.com> <CED8E5B9-2751-11D9-B7C0-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> <417E500A.8040600@cs.york.ac.uk>

Chris Jefferson wrote:

Woops, sorry!

I'm currently fixing maketuple.c so it produces the correctly formatted tuple header. I'll fix this up at the same time. Do you have any advice on what I should be using instead? is _T0 .. _T9 OK?

I think we settled to _Tp, as replacement for the dangerous _T (just grep...). Therefore, probably _Tp0 .. _Tp9 would be slightly better...

Paolo.

References:
- [v3] std::tr1::tuple
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] std::tr1::tuple
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [v3] std::tr1::tuple
  - From: Chris Jefferson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]