This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] stmt.c: Speed/clean up expand_case - Part 2
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 04 19:49:36 EDT
- Subject: Re: [patch] stmt.c: Speed/clean up expand_case - Part 2
> There could be a remote possibility of a backend generating CONST_INT
> for a tree node that is not INTEGER_CST, so I left the following
> intact.
I would be shocked if this were the case. Particularly with
gimplification.
I can't think of a case offhand, but I wouldn't be "shocked". I'd say this
was an example of "be conservative in what you generate, but liberal in
what you accept".