This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PING] Windows patches.

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gp at qnx dot com, ericw at evcohs dot com
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:21:16 -0400
Subject: Re: [PING] Windows patches.
References: <417AB82F.4030405@aaronwl.com> <200410251858.i9PIw8tQ025887@greed.delorie.com> <417D5207.7080604@aaronwl.com>

> For these targets, this patch restores the behavior of fixincludes
> builds before it was moved to toplevel.
> 
> Does the patch really need to be signed off by all of these maintainers?
>  Unless since fixincludes moved to toplevel one of these targets added

If this is functionality that just got forgotten in the move, it's
probably "obvious enough" to check it in.  Go ahead.

References:
- [PING] Windows patches.
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: [PING] Windows patches.
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PING] Windows patches.
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]