This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-1.c on darwin

From: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:01:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-1.c on darwin
References: <5147C539-2394-11D9-8879-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> <1098471202.2915.195.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Oct 22, 2004, at 11:53 AM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 13:06, Andrew Pinski wrote:

This patch fixes the testcase gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-1.c which fails
on darwin because the stub is also named after the extern function.
We add -static to remove the stub.

OK?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

ChangeLog:
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-1.c: Add -static for *-*-darwin.

And how precisely does having the stub function with the same name
as the function name cause this to fail?  I don't see where we scan
for the function's name in this particular test so I don't see
where having duplicate names in the dump files would have an effect.

/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "foo" 5} } */

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-1.c on darwin
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

References:
- [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-1.c on darwin
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-1.c on darwin
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]