This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch: cleanup gcc.dg/vect/

From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
To: Dorit Naishlos <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:24:48 -0700
Subject: Re: patch: cleanup gcc.dg/vect/
References: <20041018235444.GA5842@us.ibm.com> <OF7F2B698B.CADDDCCF-ONC2256F32.0042754E-C2256F32.00441055@il.ibm.com>

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> 
> As for the -mpowerpc64 issue:
> 
> > Tests vect-72.c and vect-73.c use -mpowerpc64.  That has no effect on a
> > biarch compiler; should it have been -m64?
> 
> no. (by the way, it's actually tests vect-82_64.c and vect-83_64.c,
> right?).

Yes, I got the names wrong.  Should those tests only be run for
powerpc64-*-*, rather than powerpc*-*-*?

Test pr16105.c is not run for x86_64; is that an oversight?

Janis

References:
- Re: patch: cleanup gcc.dg/vect/
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: patch: cleanup gcc.dg/vect/
  - From: Dorit Naishlos

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]