This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH for partial --enable-mapped-location in gcc/java

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:41:46 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH for partial --enable-mapped-location in gcc/java
References: <415B6D7D.8000201@bothner.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409300802470.15359@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:

Does this mean the existence of the "complexity" field of struct tree_exp can now be conditioned on !defined(USE_MAPPED_LOCATION)? (Ada being the only other user, and Ada will need to change anyway for --enable-mapped-location.)

No, because the GTY machinary get confused by #ifdef's.

However, once we can rip out support for --disable-mpped-location
then we should be able to remove the complexity field.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

References:
- PATCH for partial --enable-mapped-location in gcc/java
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: PATCH for partial --enable-mapped-location in gcc/java
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]