This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:That's what I thought Jason meant as well. If it's not, he'll let you know, and we'll back it out...
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:51:03 -0700, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:I think that's pretty compelling, and I'm actually pretty sanguine about the safety of the patch. I've reviewed the patch and I'm happy with it. I certainly agree that issuing the diagnostics on the line with the function declaration is a win.
I think that it would be good for Jason to comment, before we make a final
decision
I agree.You agree that it would be good for you to comment, or you agree that you
are happy with the patch? :-)
I hope he meant the latter, because I thought that's what he meant and
therefore I checked the patch in about three hours ago.
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC (916) 791-8304 mark@codesourcery.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |