Re: Release RTL bodies after compilation (sometimes)

[David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>]

>>>>> Mike Stump writes:

Mike> If performance isn't an issue, then we should remove ggc_free.  It it 
Mike> is, we should keep it, at least until such time as another technology 
Mike> is proven to replace the need for it.

Mike> We should not allow people that don't care about performance to stop 
Mike> those that do, from achieving it.

	Mike, that is fallacious reasoning.  The discussion is about
ggc_free, not performance.  ggc_free does not automatically equate with
performance.  Linking the two issues and then arguing that people who
disagree with ggc_free are not interested in performance and are
inhibiting developers trying to improve performance is inappropriate and
unwarranted.

David