This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] FIx for 14700
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> The reason I'm pushing for testcases these days is that mainline is in quite
> bad a shape, yet we seem to have surprisingly few test failures, which
> indicates that our coverage is way too low.
While indeed we need much more coverage, there's also the problem that
those failures there are can get largely ignored - regression testers have
been showing continuous regression status since January (the last time
<http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/log.txt.gz> showed pass status) with some
target-independent regressions present continuously since March.
Regression status should be the exception rather than the rule.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/#c90status - status of C90 for GCC 4.0
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)