This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Add two ObjC++ callback functions to cp/decl.c



On 10 Sep 2004, at 16.07, Mark Mitchell wrote:


Ziemowit Laski wrote:

The patches are occurring in _files_ _belonging_ to the C++ front-end. They affect the C++ front-end only if they prevent the file(s) in question from compiling.

That's true at runtime, but not at edit time. They affect me because there is now more code that I have to look through when trying to understand how things work and more code to change when modifying things.

Mark, you've just described all changes made to all parts of the compiler. :-)


I can't simply ignore the code if I need to modify things; in some cases, your code might not even compile after I make a change.

Indeed; ditto. Can't ignore code. No good.


The SC specifically made Objective-C++ a second-class citizen. So, I'm unsympathetic to your counter-argument that changes to the C++ front end might affect Objective-C++. That was explicitly part of the deal.

Fair enough; but by the same token, if the proverbial ObjC++ fragments suddenly stop compiling, you can just '#if 0' them out and tell me to fix them.


Arguing that changes to files in cp/ don't need to be reviewed by a C++ maintainer, after you've been asked to send those patches for review, seems pretty aggressive.

It suppose it would have been "aggressive," had I actually made such an argument... Anyway, rock beats scissors, so I'll send all future cp/ mods to the list for review. :-)


Good weekend to all,

--Zem


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]