This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] tree level if-conversion for vectorizer

From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Dorit Naishlos <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>, Ayal Zaks <ZAKS at il dot ibm dot com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:43:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree level if-conversion for vectorizer
References: <20040826085655.GB3418@redhat.com> <8A2B21DE-F785-11D8-8706-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20040826175940.GD5543@redhat.com> <704A4F05-F893-11D8-A1AD-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20040830225141.GC3700@redhat.com> <80448B92-FB00-11D8-A1E0-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20040831044334.GA4561@redhat.com> <3C950169-FB10-11D8-A1E0-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20040831063608.GA5008@redhat.com> <473D0A88-FC52-11D8-9C9F-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <20040903064650.GE20559@redhat.com>

On Sep 2, 2004, at 11:46 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:05:32PM -0700, Devang Patel wrote:
+ static void
+ handle_sibling_pattern (struct loop *loop)
...
+ static void
+ fold_sibling_stmts (tree first, tree second)
Do you have a reason for these continuing to exist?

no

Seems to me this
should be taken care of by one of the standard copy-prop passes.
Patch approved if you just forgot to delete them.


Thank you,
-
Devang

References:
- Re: [PATCH] tree level if-conversion for vectorizer
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [PATCH] tree level if-conversion for vectorizer
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]