This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] bsi_for_stmt

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, apinski at apple dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:03:40 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] bsi_for_stmt
References: <20040828080737.GA16110@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <33D3B174-F92F-11D8-BF13-000393A91CAA@apple.com> <DF75550A-F931-11D8-AF57-000A95D7D16C@apple.com> <0FF6BF6A-F936-11D8-865C-00039351ED8A@apple.com> <20040830140103.GA24084@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <559E9B14-FAA6-11D8-ADE5-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>

On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:02:11AM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> Come to think of it, how about moving the linked list pointers into the
> stmt_ann_d nodes and getting rid of tree_statement_list_node's
> altogether?

Because tree_statement_list nodes exist in the front end, long
before we even consider creating stmt_ann_d nodes.

r~

References:
- [patch] Lno branch merge part 12 -- induction variable optimizations
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [patch] Lno branch merge part 12 -- induction variable optimizations
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [patch] Lno branch merge part 12 -- induction variable optimizations
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: [patch] Lno branch merge part 12 -- induction variable optimizations
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- [patch] bsi_for_stmt
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [patch] bsi_for_stmt
  - From: Dale Johannesen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]