This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] Suppress warning

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,Falk Hueffner <hueffner at informatik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>,"'gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:13:01 +0200
Subject: Re: [v3] Suppress warning
References: <4125D314.1020904@suse.de> <871xi2p014.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> <4125D794.4010802@suse.de> <m3ekm2aqqm.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <41260381.4070805@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
But his particular construct does nto deserve that warning.  And if it
has been there since 3.3.,
Since 2.95, actually. Nobody filed a PR and nobody complained, therefore, since I'm not in charge of anything having to do with the compiler, I must assume the warning is correct.

Sorry, actually the specific behavior, with ">>=" seems new and we have already a PR, closed too quickly about it (libstdc++/17120): I will reopen it as a C++ bug, and let's see what happens...

Sorry for the misunderstanding,
Paolo.

References:
- [v3] Suppress warning
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] Suppress warning
  - From: Falk Hueffner
- Re: [v3] Suppress warning
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] Suppress warning
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] Suppress warning
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]