This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Add tgmath.h


On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Now, if you think we should revert from our common working
> assumptions, then I would not disagree.  I would just ask we clearly
> define our expectations and user expectations.  This is also for the
> interest of other components shipped with GCC, e.g. libstdc++. I can
> see large benefits from tighter coupling of the C library
> implementation and GCC.
> 
> However, I don't think it is fair to locally redefine things based on
> interested random patches.

Indeed, and the presumption would be that the first method to try for such 
a tighter coupling for the benefit of libstdc++ would be discussion with 
the glibc maintainers of how glibc can usefully be adapted - for example, 
so that g++ -ansi doesn't need to define _GNU_SOURCE and so break the ISO 
C++ namespace rules - not patches to GCC alone to override glibc.  Simply 
submitting a patch is the wrong way to change policy; there should be 
agreement among the maintainers of the relevant GNU software (including 
glibc) first.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]