Re: [libgfortran] PR 16137: libgfortran on non-C99 targets

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:34:34PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> Hopefully, gfortran's use of nextafterf doesn't depend upon
> its operation with denormalized numbers.

Well, actually, from my reading the NEAREST intrinsic *should*
in fact operate correctly with denormals, and that

	NEAREST(0.0, 1.0)

should yield the minimal denormal.

You could see if the following works for your target.  It passes
the attached tests vs the glibc implementation.


r~

Attachment: z.c
Description: Text document