This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Two gimplification issues
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 04 21:11:28 EDT
- Subject: Re: Two gimplification issues
> As far as I know, that can apply to this case. We then return
> either GS_OK, in that case or else GS_ALL_DONE, which seems right because
> we've already gimplified the LHS.
You're making no sense here.
Sorry. What I was trying to say is that I see no difference between
that case and any of the others. In all of them, you need to deal
with the possibility of a return value and in all of them, all needed
gimplification has been done. So I'd think that doing a "break" and
going to the common code was the proper thing.