This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:14:21 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily
References: <200407170732.i6H7W5vN028084@sirius.codesourcery.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0407191828240.4987@linux.site> <40FD5AE3.9010801@codesourcery.com><Pine.BSF.4.58.0407212008150.50466@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><40FEDEC7.7090501@codesourcery.com> <40FFD50F.10004@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> yes, an incomplete(able) type has no binfo.  Fixed thusly.

Thanks a lot!  Works like a charm, not just for the testcase, but the
entire application behind that.

Gerald

References:
- C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Allocate implicit constructors lazily
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]